MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411643018 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105199

69O Novel regimens for persistent/recurrent rare epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOCs) selected according to biomarker status: ENGOT-GYN2/GOG-3051/BOUQUET phase II study results

2025· article· en· W4411643018 on OpenAlexafffund
Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard, Robert F. Miller, Jubilee Brown, JW Kim, S. Lheureux, Andrés Redondo, Lauren E. Yauch, Max Dieterich, P. Zhornikova, Venkatesh Krishnan, Sana Intidhar Labidi‐Galy, Fatih Köse, Sandro Pignata, Lucy Gilbert, F. Joly Lobbedez, Charlie Gourley, David M. O’Malley, June‐Yong Lee, Dominique Berton-Rigaud, David M. Gershenson

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersDaiichi Sankyo EuropeDefence and Security AcceleratorTakeda OncologyGenentechPharmaMarEuropean Society for Medical OncologyEisaiAbbVieEuropean CommissionSeagenMerckMersana TherapeuticsAmgenDeciphera PharmaceuticalsAstraZenecaNovocureRegeneron PharmaceuticalsSociedad Española de Oncología MédicaEisai CanadaBeiGeneClovis OncologyPfizerIncyteF. Hoffmann-La RocheMyriad GeneticsBristol-Myers SquibbAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyVifor Pharma
KeywordsOncologyOvarian carcinomasBiomarkerOvarian cancerInternal medicineMedicinePhases of clinical researchEpithelial ovarian cancerOvarian carcinomaBiologyCancerToxicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The BOUQUET study (NCT04931342) is evaluating biomarker-directed regimens for patients (pts) with recurrent rare EOCs and suboptimal treatment options. We report results from combination regimens including inavolisib (inavo, a PI3Kα-selective inhibitor), giredestrant (gire, an oral selective oestrogen receptor degrader [SERD]), CDK4/6 inhibitors, letrozole, bevacizumab (bev), olaparib and atezolizumab (atezo).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207