MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411643374 · doi:10.1103/bq28-r2r7

Classical and Quantum Algorithms for Characters of the Symmetric Group

2025· article· en· W4411643374 on OpenAlexafffund
David Gosset, Vojtech Havlicek, Louis Schatzki

Bibliographic record

VenuePRX Quantum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueGovernment of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchInternational Business Machines Corporation
KeywordsGroup (periodic table)QuantumAlgorithmComputer scienceAlgebra over a fieldMathematicsPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characters of irreducible representations are ubiquitous in group theory. However, computing characters of some groups such as the symmetric group <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msub> <a:mi>S</a:mi> <a:mi>n</a:mi> </a:msub> </a:math> is a challenging problem known to be #P-hard in the worst case. Here we describe a matrix product state (MPS) algorithm for characters of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msub> <c:mi>S</c:mi> <c:mi>n</c:mi> </c:msub> </c:math> . The algorithm computes an MPS encoding all irreducible characters of a given permutation. It relies on a mapping from characters of <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:msub> <e:mi>S</e:mi> <e:mi>n</e:mi> </e:msub> </e:math> to quantum spin chains proposed by Crichigno and Prakash. We also provide a simpler derivation of this mapping. We complement this result by presenting a <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi>poly</g:mi> <g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo> <g:mi>n</g:mi> <g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo> </g:math> size quantum circuit that prepares the corresponding MPS obtaining an efficient quantum algorithm for certain sampling problems based on characters of <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:msub> <k:mi>S</k:mi> <k:mi>n</k:mi> </k:msub> </k:math> . To assess classical hardness of these problems, we present a general reduction from strong simulation (computing a given probability) to weak simulation (sampling with a small error). This reduction applies to any sampling problem with a certain granularity structure and may be of independent interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRX QuantumSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207