Experimental description, TD-DFT and computational simulation for [PVA/GO+CdTe] <sup>HNF</sup> hybrid nanofluid axisymmetric flow via slanted elongating cylinder
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The experimental and thermal characteristics of hybridized nanofluid with mixed convection stagnating point flow of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) with cadmium telluride (CdTe) in combination with graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles [PVA/GO+CdTe]HNFvia a slanted elongating cylinder with magnetized force are examined. GO and CdTe nanoparticles are dropped in PVA to fabricate a hybrid nanofluid. The microporous structure thin films are fabricated from [PVA/GO+CdTe]HNFvia spin coating. The controlling formulas are streamlined to ordinary differential equations and are resolved computationally utilizing NDSolve in Mathematica software. The results obtained show 23% upsurge in heat transfer when the curvature parameter improves, 18% higher for thermal performance at φ=2%, and 15% with an intensified magnetic field compared to conventional nanofluids. TDDFT (CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)) analysis also indicates a smaller energy gap (0.683 eV) than PVA case (6.429) and 2.3 times greater Fermi-level electron density, supporting the possible benefits of electron cooling in renewable energy uses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it