MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411647656 · doi:10.3366/ccs.2025.0561

Sister Outsiders of the Lesbian Bar: Spatial Hauntings in Audre Lorde's <i>Zami: A New Spelling of My Name</i>

2025· article· en· W4411647656 on OpenAlexaff
Emma Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative Critical Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrime and Detective Fiction Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSisterSpellingLesbianArtGender studiesSociologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In weaving queer temporality and Black feminist theory together, this article examines the role of the lesbian bar in Audre Lorde's 1982 biomythography Zami: A New Spelling of My Name. This article examines the various ways Audre Lorde as both main character and author experiences and negotiates the spaces and dynamics of the 1950s working-class lesbian bar in Greenwich Village, New York City. I analyse how Lorde conceives of the lesbian bar as the only place available for lesbians in 1950s New York City, but also how Lorde experiences feeling out of place and unbelonging in this supposed ‘only’ place for lesbians at the time. I examine both the fleeting moments of acceptance within the lesbian bar and the affective, lonely and displaced experiences of the bar, particularly for Black lesbians or, as Lorde names them, the ‘sister outsiders’. Engaging ideas of hauntology and queer temporality, this article contemplates how Lorde works within, bends and alters the common, hegemonic understandings of the lesbian bar as the only place for acceptance and community. Furthermore, in drawing on the Black feminist theory of Katherine McKittrick and Marquis Bey, this article concludes with an analysis of how Lorde and other sister outsiders re-negotiate and redetermine place, belonging, gender, sexuality and Blackness within the sometimes necessary yet oftentimes confining space of the lesbian bar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative Critical StudiesSame topicCrime and Detective Fiction StudiesFrench-language works237,207