Anxiety and Depression Screening of Youth in Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension Clinic: A Multi‐Center, Cross‐Sectional Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Children with chronic diseases, including pulmonary hypertension (PH), have an increased risk of anxiety and depression (AD), impacting mental health (MH), and quality of life (QoL). We sought to characterize the prevalence of AD in pediatric PH and identify associated factors. We developed a prospective cross‐sectional study with 10 Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension Network (PPHNet) centers. Eligible subjects aged 12–21, diagnosed with PH, and English or Spanish speaking, completed validated AD screening questionnaires during routine outpatient clinic visits. Caregivers provided socioeconomic status (SES) data and MH history via survey. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were analyzed using standard descriptive statistics. Eighty‐eight patients were enrolled (female = 54, 61%). Forty‐six (51.7%) identified at least mild symptoms of AD. Females were more likely to report AD than males (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.11–6.61, p = 0.030). There were no significant associations between AD and PH severity, MH history, family dynamics, SES status, race, or ethnicity. Twenty‐seven of those patients (58.7%) received MH education/counseling by MH professionals; ten (21.7%) were referred to MH providers, and nine patients (19.6%) were assessed for suicide safety. Adolescents with PH have a high prevalence of AD. Female patients had increased AD compared to male patients; no other predictors were linked to the prevalence of AD. Routine AD screening should be integrated into outpatient PH clinic visits with a focus on psychosocial support for young females diagnosed with PH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it