MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411652667 · doi:10.3399/bjgp.2025.0135

Competencies and clinical guidelines for managing acne with isotretinoin in general practice: a scoping review

2025· review· en· W4411652667 on OpenAlexaffabout
Diarmuid Quinlan, Laura J. Sahm, Linda M. O’Keeffe, Miriam Santer, Alison Layton, Tony Foley

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of General Practice · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public Health
FundersHealth Service ExecutiveIrish College of General Practitioners
KeywordsMedicineIsotretinoinCINAHLAcneChecklistPsycINFOGuidelineMEDLINEFamily medicineSystematic reviewHealth careNursingDermatologyPsychological interventionPathologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acne is a common, chronic, and burdensome disease. There is evidence of delayed and inequitable patient access to isotretinoin. Overuse of antibiotics in patients with acne raises antimicrobial stewardship concerns. AIM: To identify clinical practice guideline (CPG) and consensus statement recommendations regarding the clinical competencies required for prescribing oral isotretinoin for acne. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a scoping review of acne CPGs and consensus statements, globally. METHOD: The Arksey and O'Malley framework informed design in conjunction with Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. The PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guided reporting. The search was conducted across six databases (Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO), three guideline repositories (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Guidelines International Network, Trip), and grey literature. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts, and full-text papers. The AGREE II checklist appraised CPG quality. RESULTS: From the initial 2292 articles, eight CPGs were included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Five were from Europe, with one each from the US, Canada, and Malaysia. The CPG guidance varied regarding 'Which doctor may prescribe isotretinoin?' All CPGs indicated dermatologists and four identified GPs as appropriate prescribers. The CPGs identify the clinical competencies to safely manage people with acne using isotretinoin: dermatology, pregnancy prevention, mental health assessment, and blood testing. CONCLUSION: This scoping review has identified the key clinical competencies that underpin safe management of people with acne using isotretinoin: dermatology, pregnancy prevention, mental health assessment, and blood testing. Resourcing and supporting GPs to incrementally adopt this role may promote safe, timely, and equitable patient access to isotretinoin, while enhancing antimicrobial stewardship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.107
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.107
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0260.023
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of General PracticeSame topicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsFrench-language works237,207