MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411653764 · doi:10.1002/mds.30276

Protective Effects of Genetic Proxies of Cognitive Reserve in Parkinson's Disease: A Longitudinal Multi‐Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4411653764 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Young Eun Huh, Beomjin Jang, Sang‐Hyuk Jung, Dokyoon Kim, Towfique Raj, Hong‐Hee Won

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsCognitive reserveHazard ratioCognitive declineInternal medicineCognitionMedicineProportional hazards modelPsychosisOncologyDementiaConfidence intervalDiseaseGerontologyPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Resilience factors are crucial in the progression of neurodegenerative diseases. However, it remains unclear whether a genetic predisposition to cognitive reserve influences clinical heterogeneity in the prognosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVES: The aim is to evaluate the utility of polygenic scores (PGSs) for cognitive reserve proxies, including intelligence (INT), educational attainment (EA), and occupational attainment (OA), in predicting the clinical progression of PD. METHODS: Genetic and clinical data for progression of PD (progression to Hoehn and Yahr stage ≥3, progression to a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≤24, and occurrence of psychosis) were obtained from the Accelerating Medicine Partnership Parkinson's Disease database. We conducted multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusting for relevant covariates, including years of education, variants in APOE, GBA1, LRRK2, and other cognitive reserve-related PGSs. RESULTS: All cognitive reserve-related PGSs significantly reduced the risk of cognitive decline, and EA-PGS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.550; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.447-0.676; P < 0.001) remained significant after controlling for INT-PGS and OA-PGS. EA-PGS (HR, 0.805; 95% CI, 0.672-0.964; P = 0.019) was significantly associated with better motor prognosis after controlling for other PGSs. OA-PGS was linked to a decreased risk of developing psychosis in PD and remained significant after adjusting for others (HR, 0.784; 95% CI, 0.631-0.975; P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic proxies of cognitive reserve are associated with a reduced risk of cognitive decline, motor progression, and development of psychosis in PD. These findings may enhance our understanding of individual differences in resilience in progression of PD. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207