Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Physical activity and foods containing antioxidants seem to be beneficial for cardiovascular disease prevention.The present research aims to examine the effect of anaerobic exercise with melatonin consumption on the expression of HSP60 and HSP70 markers in rat myocard after ischemicreperfusion.Methods: 30 male Wistar rats weighted approximately 200-250 g and aged two to three months old were used.The pilot group (N = 14) was divided into healthy group without isoprenaline induction (N=7) and the isoprenaline-induced group with (N = 7).In following, rats in melatonin group (N = 4) were gavaged every day for one month using a dose of 10 mg/kg BW.Meanwhile, rats in anaerobic group and melatonin anaerobic group were exposed tredmill training course with frequency of three times per week for one month.Finally, rats were sacrificed after confirmation of infarct and expression of HSP60 and HSP70 gene were studied by real-time method.Results: There was a significant difference between the experimental groups in terms of changes in HSP70 genes expression.It was found that there was no significant difference between the two anaerobic and melatonin anaerobic groups (sig.=0.989).There was no significant difference between the experimental groups in terms of changes in HSP70 genes expression because the significance was estimated 0.297 which was greater than 0.05.Conclusion: Melatonin therapy and anaerobic training have negligible effect on HSP60 and HSP70 gene expression.But, anaerobic exercise with consuming melatonin can decrease and increase HSP60 and HSP70 gene expression respectively but don't show a significant effect compared to melatonin therapy alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.995 | 0.989 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".