MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411656601 · doi:10.51847/ii0pmludcv

10.51847/Ii0pmluDcv

2000· article· en· W4411656601 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbandonment (legal)SocioeconomicsBusinessGeographyPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigated the likely problems resulted from the abandoned housing projects in Nigeria with special considerations to Bauchi metropolis as an emergent urban area.Abandoned housing projects are an alarming phenomenon that existed for decades in Nigeria.This occurred due to different factors such as, the poor quality control by regulatory agencies; the lack of access to credit facilities, inflations, corruption, communication gaps among the personnel, the cost of building materials, and the inability of clients to engage contractors or designers' capabilities, etc.The objectives of this research study were to determine the factors responsible for the abandonment projects, to identify the consequences of the abandoned projects.The adopted method was quantitative; the population of the targeted respondents was gotten through BSDB.The primary data was collected using structural questionnaires.346questionnaires were distributed across the study area, and 285 were retrieved.The primary data was analysed, and the discussion of the results revealed that the abandoned housing projects caused a lot of harm in the neighbourhood, like criminal hideouts and unsecured areas.It was revealed that inflation caused the housing project to be abandoned.It was concluded that the government should intervene through the implementation of housing development regulations, and concerned agencies should be alert most especially the Bauchi State Development Board on the economic capabilities of the intended homeowners.More again, other relevant agencies strictly implementing the condition for housing development should contain the rules for housing development.The individuals should be enlightened on the problems caused by these abandoned housing projects for the neighbourhood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9950.986

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicUrban and Rural Development ChallengesFrench-language works237,207