Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: To study the prevalence of overweight and obesity among adults in Enugu metropolis, Nigeria.Methods: A cross-sectional study involving randomly selected 716 adults was conducted.Standard anthropometric measurements were taken, and fasting glucose concentration was determined.Results: The prevalence of overweight and obesity was 29.9% and 13.1%, respectively.Overweight and obesity affected females more than males.Overweight was 36.7% in females, and 25.0% in males, while female obesity was 16.0% and 11.0% in males (P<0.05).Overweight and obesity were the highest among the age group of 40-49.A greater proportion of married participants were overweight (56.3%) and obese (36.1%) compared to their single counterparts (23.2%) and (14.6%); respectively (P<0.05).Traders (56.2%) and civil servants (50.2%) had a higher prevalence of overweight, but obesity was seen mostly in civil servants (30.2%).Overweight males were more diabetic (20.2%), while obese females were more frequently diabetic (18.8%).Conclusion: Overweight and obesity have been found to be common in Enugu metropolis.Increased physical activities at home and in work places in addition to the nutritional education would reduce this burden.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.997 | 0.993 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it