Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Lateral ankle sprain is one of the most common injuries in sports.The purpose of the present study is comparison between function, strength and endurance of selected central muscle in volleyball players with and without chronic ankle instability.Material and methods: A total of 40 female volleyball player (age=24 years) were participated in this study.McGill endurance tests, MMT, Y balance test, Figure-eight jump and lateral jump test were used to measure trunk endurance, strength, balance and function of volleyball players of two groups, respectively.Results: According to the results of an independent t-test, significant differences were observed between groups including thigh abduction (p=0.006) and thigh's external rotation strength (p=0.02), the Sorensen test (p=0.02),60° flexion test (p=0.02),abdominal bridge (p-0.03),internal posterior directions (p=0.02) and external posterior directions (p=0.08),Y balance test and total Y test (p=0.008), Figure -eight hop tests (p=0.02) and lateral jump test (p=0.03) in the two groups including with and without chronic ankle instability.Conclusion: According to the results, if the previous ankle sprain as a factor is accompanied with lack of rehabilitation program, this can have a negative impact on athletes' strength and endurance of the trunk and thigh region, balance and performance.Accordingly, using rehabilitation and training programs of the thigh and trunk region and also balance training are suggested in order to prevent recurrence of ankle sprain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.929 | 0.921 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".