Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnancy is a period in which there are many physical, hormonal and emotional changes in the health status of pregnant women and have a significant impact on the health-related quality of life.The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of childbirth preparation classes on health-related quality of life in pregnant women.Methods: This was a semi-experimental interventional study that was carried out on 80 pregnant women referring to Sina hospital in Karoon city, Iran.Selection of samples was purposeful.For the intervention group, childbirth preparation classes were held in eight sessions from 20th week of pregnancy.The control group only received routine prenatal visits.At the end of pregnancy, quality of life was measured by SF36 questionnaire and compared in two groups.Results: According to the findings of this study, the intervention group had a significantly better score of quality of life in comparison with the control group.The intervention group received higher scores in terms of general health, physical function, physical pain, mental health, limitation of movement due to emotional problems and social function than the control group.Other dimensions including limitation of movement due to physical problems and feeling of jolly were statistically similar in both groups.Conclusion: Improving the information and knowledge of mothers in the form of holding childbirth preparation classes can improve the health of mothers and their quality of life.In order to achieve the health of mothers, it is better to more focus on the dimensions of limitation of movement due to physical problems and Feel jolly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.926 | 0.855 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".