Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the content of social science curriculum of the sixth-grade elementary school based on the components of national citizenship.Research components included environment conservation, rectitude, interaction with others, attention to health, discipline, accountability, law observance, and specialization.Hence, in this study, social science textbooks of the sixth-grade of elementary school were analyzed as the most important source of education to settle how much they were moving toward the education of a national citizen.The description criterion was the national citizen and the registration unit sentence and question.The results showed that there is a significant difference between the components of the national citizenship of the Social Studies Book of elementary sixth-grade in the regard of the national citizen (P <0.001).Also, Chi-squared test result revealed that there is a significant difference between the dynamic text and the passive text of the sixth-grade books concerning addressing the national citizen (P <0.001).According to the involvement coefficient level (0.3), the students' involvement coefficient is not at the appropriate level regarding the text.The involvement coefficient (0.58) is in an appropriate level for the national citizen concerning image.Students' involvement coefficient ratio was (1.7) in respect of the question, which showed that the national citizenship categories are not in a suitable level according to the question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.991 | 0.979 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".