Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of study was to investigate the relationship between organizational culture and performance of employees.This study is the descriptive and correlation.This research can be a research field.The population of this research is all the staff of Rasoule Akram hospital (PBUH) in the city of Abdanan in 2015.The number of employees is 111.To determine the sample size according to the number of the population is equal to the sample size, census method is used.The instrument used in this study is (a) organizational culture questionnaire (Alvani, 1997), (b) employee performance questionnaire (Asadi et al., 2009).Cronbach's alpha was used to obtain reliability that for all components was 0.7 higher than the maximum allowed, which confirmed the reliability of the questionnaire.Data collected from Pearson correlation analyzed by using spss software.This research has nine hypotheses that the results of the analysis showed that all of these assumptions have been approved.In other words, it was found that there is a significant and positive and direct relationship between all components of organizational culture and employee performance.In addition, it was found that the intensity of the relationship between risk component and employee performance was more than other components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.950 | 0.989 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".