Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marriage is a bond of marriage between a man and woman which intend to start a unity for a family and a common life.This contract is a kind of consensual contract and the man and woman create it with their clear expression of wills and their agreement.A man and woman can put up what they want as stipulation in their agreement.But contrary to the principle of freedom of contracts in private law, marriage with its special situation, is a kind of contract which the freedom of the parties in determining the stipulations isn't limitless and a lot of rules and regulations are necessary for marriage and none of them don't have the right to agree against it.The condition of qualification insert in the contract and according to it, the parties or one of them make provisions of quality or quantity.In the condition of quality, the parties or one of them want a quality or qualities which a quality is made as a provision in the contract.The purpose of this essay is examining the condition of quality in marriage and its enforcement which is used of a descriptive-analytical way.The conclusion of this essay show based on the article 1128 of civil code: "when a condition of quality is stipulated in one party and after the contract, it determined that such party didn't have the quality, there is a right to terminate for the other party, Whether the quality be determined in the contract or the contract be situated on it implicitly".And in the case of violation of the condition of quality, the party who the condition is for him, has the right to termination according to articles of 235 and 410.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.952 | 0.942 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".