Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jalil Mohammadgholizadeh" and " Mirza Aliakbar Dehkhoda" are two important writers of constitutional age, in addition to their pen influence and leaving impression on awakening thoughts of people, each one of them has pioneered at least a literal movement:"Jalil Mohammadgholizadeh" is pioneer in criticalrealistic literature and " Mirza Aliakbar Dehkhoda" is founder of modern prose and pioneer of modern satire in Persian literature.Study and comparison of works of "Jalil Mohammadgholizadeh" and" Mirza Aliakbar Dehkhoda" shows that there are some similarities between the satire styles of these two.These similarities include the sameness of common concepts and contents and the way of entering the main matter, using conversational and simple tone(oral literature), approaches of prayers, plenty of allegories and other items.The present article has studied the similarities between the way of satire of "Jalil Mohammadgholizadeh" and "Mirza Aliakbar Dehkhoda" using comparative and analyticapproach and tries to explain the issue of attention of Dehkhoda to the way of writing of Azerbaijani satirist and taking patterns from his style by presenting examples of this sameness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.999 | 0.998 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".