Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay investigates the influence of Ancient Persian Illumination philosophy on the philosophy of Suhrawardi.Shaikh Shahab al-Din Suhrawardi, known as Shaikh al-Ishraq (Master of Illumination) was a 12 th century philosopher and mystic.He is considered to be the founder of Illumination philosophy and also the reviver of ancient Persian philosophy of light and Illumination.To put it differently, the ancient Illumination philosophy is reflected in his works.Shaikh al-Ishraq was able to write something which no one before him had ventured to write.Given his philosophical achievements, he considered himself a torchlight in the history of philosophy.Having studied the influence of ancient Persian philosophy, it can be concluded that all such influence can be summarized in terms of the principle of light which was borrowed from ancient philosophy.According to this idea, Suhrawardi called his philosophy the philosophy of Ishraq, meaning light and illumination.His basic notions are explained in relation to this principle of light.In his philosophical system, Suhrawardi divides the world into light and darkness and also uses many notions from ancient philosophy, including, shahriwar (one of the gods in Zoroastrianism, heavenly kingdom) and huraxš (burning light, the sun).This study uses the existing literature on Suhrawardi and an analytical-descriptive method to discuss the topic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.951 | 0.946 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".