MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

5. 24-Hour Ex-Vivo Perfusion in the Swine Total Hindlimb Model

2025· article· en· W4411672335 on OpenAlexaff
Çağdaş Duru, Alina Stoian, Felor Biniazan, Florian Le Billan, Siba Haykal

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEx vivoHindlimbPerfusionMedicineIn vivoCardiologyAnatomyBiologyBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) is expanding worldwide. Currently, static cold storage at 4°C is the standard preservation method for large extremity segments in transplantation and trauma but has limitations in preservation time. Ex vivo perfusion techniques are gaining interest in VCA preservation. This study presents a 24-hour sub-normothermic perfusion protocol in a swine total hindlimb model, using autologous red blood cells (RBCs) as oxygen carriers. Methods: Five consecutive 24-hour ex vivo perfusions were compared to 14 cold storage controls (12 hours SCS). Limbs were flushed with low potassium dextran solution (LPD). The perfusate included LPD enriched with 2.5 g/dL BSA and supplemented with heparin, methylprednisolone, dextrose, insulin, L-alanyl L-glutamine, and sodium bicarbonate. Washed RBCs were added to achieve a hematocrit of 10–15%. Perfusion pressure was maintained at 60–65 mmHg, and muscle temperature between 28–32ºC. Hourly perfusate analysis and compartment pressure measurements were performed. Perfusate free hemoglobin was measured every 4 hours, and muscle biopsies from the thigh(proximal) and foot(distal) were taken every 6 hours for morphologic assessment and ATP measurement. At 24 hours, neuromuscular stimulation and ICG angiography were performed. Limb weight was recorded at baseline and endpoint. Results: The average animal weight was 39.38 kg, with limb weights of 4.06 kg. Washed RBC volume was 1.1 L, and ischemia time averaged 68.00 minutes. Mean percent weight change was -0.62% in controls and -0.53% in the perfusion group, with no significant differences between groups. In proximal muscles, baseline injury score was 3.03 in perfusion limbs and 2.78 in SCS limbs. At 24 hours, scores were 3.26 and 3.73, respectively, with a significant increase in cold storage controls (p = 0.0240) but no change in the perfusion group (p = 0.9916). In distal muscles, baseline scores were 2.90 (Perfusion) and 2.91 (SCS), increasing to 4.63 and 3.97 at endpoint, with a significant rise in cold storage controls but no change in perfused limbs (p = 0.3533). ATP levels significantly dropped in cold storage controls. In proximal muscle, ATP decreased from 0.573 to 0.18 nmol/μL (p < 0.001), and in distal muscle, from 0.458 to 0.12 nmol/μL at 12 hours (p < 0.001). In contrast, perfusion maintained ATP levels, with no significant decline at 24 hours (proximal: 0.416 to 0.367 nmol/μL, p = 0.1727; distal: 0.315 to 0.267 nmol/μL, p = 0.9759). Limbs retained contractility at 24 hours, though two limbs showed patchy distal ICG signal. Conclusions: We successfully demonstrated the feasibility of 24-hour whole hindlimb perfusion while maintaining stable physiological parameters, preserved muscle morphology, conserved energy stores, sustained contraction response, and no weight change. No significant myocyte damage was observed in both biopsy sites, indicating consistent perfusion throughout the limb. ATP levels remained stable, unlike cold storage controls, which declined. These findings suggest perfusion may extend preservation time 2- to 4-fold compared to cold storage however reperfusion study is needed.Figure 1.: Muscle Analyses. A) HISS scores for proximal muscle and representative images (10x) B) HISS scores for distal muscle and representative images (10x) C) ATP content in proximal and distal muscles (10mg), Asterisk: Hypoxic myocytes, Error bars represent standard deviation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207