MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411672737 · doi:10.1090/tran/9506

Uniform property Γ and the small boundary property

2025· article· en· W4411672737 on OpenAlexafffund
Grigoris Kopsacheilis, Hung-Chang Liao, Aaron Tikuisis, Andrea Vaccaro

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersEuropean Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsMathematicsProperty (philosophy)Boundary (topology)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove that, for a free action α : G ↷ X \alpha \colon G \curvearrowright X of a countably infinite discrete amenable group on a compact metric space, the small boundary property is implied by uniform property Γ \Gamma of the Cartan subalgebra ( C ( X ) ⊆ C ( X ) ⋊ α G ) (C(X) \subseteq C(X) \rtimes _\alpha G) . The reverse implication has been demonstrated by Kerr and Szabó, from which we obtain that these two conditions are equivalent. We moreover show that, if α \alpha is also minimal, then almost finiteness of α \alpha is implied by tracial Z \mathcal {Z} -stability of the subalgebra ( C ( X ) ⊆ C ( X ) ⋊ α G ) (C(X) \subseteq C(X) \rtimes _\alpha G) . The reverse implication is due to Kerr, resulting in the equivalence of these two properties as well. As an application, we prove that if α : G ↷ X \alpha \colon G \curvearrowright X and β : H ↷ Y \beta \colon H \curvearrowright Y

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207