Responsible leadership and job embeddedness in hospitality: The role of managers’ light-triad personality and employees’ prosocial identity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Responsible leaders demonstrate their concern and accountability to diverse groups of stakeholders. This emerging leadership style is relevant to and necessary in the hospitality industry, as hospitality organizations face increasing complexity in stakeholders’ demands. Despite this complexity, little is known about responsible leadership’s antecedents and consequences for hotel workers. Drawing on conservation of resources theory, we explore whether the trait of light-triad personality is related to responsible leadership, based on employees’ perceptions of their leaders’ behavior. The findings also demonstrate the relationship between managers’ responsible leadership and employees’ job embeddedness, and confirm company prosocial identity as a boundary condition in that relationship. Structural equation modeling was employed to test the theoretical model, using 407 hotel workers’ responses collected in Turkey. The findings confirm all proposed relationships. This study makes important theoretical contributions and has implications for the hotel context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it