Breaking the cycle of oxidative stress for better behavioral health in autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition marked by socio-communicative and behavioral challenges. ASD is increasingly linked to oxidative stress, which stems from a destructive imbalance state whereby excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) overwhelm antioxidant defenses. This redox imbalance triggers a cascade of cellular dysfunctions, which in neurons include synaptic inefficiency, altered receptor function, excitotoxicity, and chronic neuroinflammation. All these dysfunctions add an additional burden to the genetic and epigenetic contributions underlying autism pathophysiology in each single individual, ultimately exacerbating ASD core symptoms. Strikingly, children with ASD exhibit diminished antioxidant capacity, correlated with heightened behavioral severity and impaired quality of life. This scoping review explores the intricate relationship between oxidative stress and ASD, evaluating current therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring redox balance while identifying critical research gaps. Interventions such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC), vitamin and mineral supplementation, and dietary antioxidants have shown promise in mitigating oxidative damage and improving social responsiveness. Other strategies, in particular hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) and cleanroom environments, are highly controversial. Well-designed randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) integrating clinical and psychodiagnostic measures with precision medicine frameworks, are crucial for developing targeted therapies that, restoring redox homeostasis, may optimize neurodevelopmental outcomes. By summarizing current evidence and addressing these gaps, this review underscores the therapeutic potential of oxidative stress correction in improving the quality of life of individuals with ASD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".