MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411682764 · doi:10.1055/a-2564-1213

Maternal Matters: Neurosurgery During Pregnancy—A German Nationwide Survey

2025· article· en· W4411682764 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catharina Conzen, Karlijn Hakvoort, Katharina Seyfried, Hans Clusmann, Anke Hoellig

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European Neurosurgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiversity and Career in Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyMedicineGermanNeurosurgeryAutonomyFamily medicineLegislationQuarter (Canadian coin)ObstetricsGynecologyPediatricsSurgeryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In Germany, pregnancy often results in a ban from the operating theater for surgeons, reflecting legislation prioritizing maternal and fetal protection over individual autonomy. Due to limited data for German neurosurgeons, we aimed to assess the attitudes of German women neurosurgeons toward continuing surgical work during pregnancy and lactation to provide appropriate recommendations. We conducted an online SurveyMonkey survey among all female members of the German Society for Neurosurgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie) and the Professional Association of German Neurosurgeons (Berufsverband Deutsche Neurochirurgie). Of 286 invited women neurosurgeons, 122 responded (42.6%), with 65 (53.3%) having children or being currently pregnant with their first child. The majority (98.5%) desired to continue surgery during pregnancy, yet 80% expressed concerns about announcing their pregnancy due to potential job-related disadvantages. However, 35.4% (23 out of 65) ceased surgery due to an immediate ban imposed by the company physician and only a minority due to health-related issues (n = 2). Of the remaining 42 women who initially continued operating, 73.2% reported good departmental support during pregnancy. However, 18.5% (12/65) faced a subsequent surgery ban after announcing their pregnancy. Overall, there were no successful appeals (n = 13). Nearly a third eventually resumed surgery, implementing additional protective measures such as extended disease testing. However, self-estimation revealed a reduced surgical performance of approximately 35% compared with the year before pregnancy. Five women (7.7%) informed the company physician only at the end of pregnancy to circumvent the ban. Approximately a quarter (27%) experienced surgery-free periods of 1 to 1.5 years, whereas 21% reported 1.5 to 2 years per pregnancy. Forty-four percent reported discrimination in surgery allocation upon return, whereas 48% reported none. Most women neurosurgeons aspire to continue surgery during pregnancy, yet face involuntary bans. Despite permission to operate, procedural volumes decrease significantly, compounded by surgery-free periods during lactation and parental leave, and reported discrimination upon return. We hypothesize that pregnancy-related bans exacerbate a glass ceiling effect, impeding women neurosurgeons' career progression, and propose removing bureaucratic obstacles to enable continued surgical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European NeurosurgerySame topicDiversity and Career in MedicineFrench-language works237,207