MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411687028 · doi:10.22584/nr57.2025.012

Building a Policy Muscle: Learning from Northern Youth about Arctic Tourism

2025· article· en· W4411687028 on OpenAlex
Steven Showalter

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Northern Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsWalter and Duncan Gordon Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismArcticThe arcticGeographyEnvironmental planningOceanographyGeologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Northern Review 57: 171–177 Sharing the Arctic: A Sustainable Future for Arctic Tourismhttps://gordonfoundation.ca/resource/2024-arctic-policy-hackathon-policy-recommendations/Abstract: This article reflects on policy recommendations from the third Arctic Policy Hackathon, the importance of cross-Arctic collaboration, and why young leaders from the Canadian North should engage with policy development. Policy Hackathons see young leaders from diverse backgrounds collaborate on a significant policy issue, in this case how to keep the next generation of leaders in the Arctic. It is a model of learning about policy that prioritizes the voices and lived experience of the next generation of leaders, brings their ideas to the forefront, and gives them the skills to turn ideas into action. The third Arctic Policy Hackathon, organized by the Gordon Foundation in partnership with the Arctic Mayors’ Forum and with support from Global Affairs Canada, saw emerging leaders from the Canadian North join their counterparts from across the Arctic in Reykjavik, Iceland. Participants also engaged with policy leaders and shared their recommendations at the Arctic Circle Assembly, taking valuable lessons back to their home communities. Résumé: Cet article présente les recommandations politiques issues du troisième Hackathon politique pour l’Arctique, souligne l’importance de la collaboration circumpolaire, et explique pourquoi les jeunes leaders du Nord canadien devraient s’impliquer dans l’élaboration des politiques. Les Hackathons politiques réunissent de jeunes leaders de divers horizons pour collaborer sur une question politique majeure, ici comment assurer la relève des leaders en Arctique. Ce modèle d’apprentissage politique met en avant les voix et l’expérience vécue de la nouvelle génération, valorise leurs idées et leur donne les outils pour les transformer en actions concrètes. Le troisième Hackathon politique pour l’Arctique, organisé par la Gordon Foundation en partenariat avec l’Arctic Mayors’ Forum et avec le soutien d’Affaires mondiales Canada, a rassemblé des leaders émergents du Nord canadien avec leurs homologues de tout l’Arctique à Reykjavik, en Islande. Les participants ont aussi échangé avec des décideurs politiques et partagé leurs recommandations lors de l’Assemblée du Cercle Arctique, ramenant des leçons précieuses dans leurs communautés. French translation, Sara Tahiri

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it