Evaluation of Coastal Sediment Dynamics Utilizing Natural Radionuclides and Validated In-Situ Radioanalytical Methods at Legrena Beach, Attica Region, Greece
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was realized in the frame of an IAEA Coordinated Research Project for the evaluation of sediment dynamics, applying in-situ radiometric methods accompanied with a theoretical model. The in-situ methods were validated using lab-based high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometry. Sediment dynamics assessments were performed based on the measured and mapped activity concentrations of specific 238U progenies (214Bi or 214Pb), 232Th progenies (208Tl and 228Ac), and 40K along the shoreline of the beach. The maps of the activity concentrations of natural radionuclides were produced rapidly using software tools (R language v4.5). The sediment dynamics of the studied area were also investigated through numerical simulations, applying an open source model considering land–sea interactions and meteorological conditions and the corresponding sediment processes. The assessments, which were conducted utilizing the detailed data from the natural radioactivity maps, were validated by the simulation results, since both were found to be in agreement. Generally, it was confirmed that the distribution of radionuclides reflects the selective transport processes of sediments, which are related to the corresponding processes that occur in the study area. Legrena Beach in Attica, Greece, served as a pilot area for the comparative analysis of methods and demonstration of their relevance and applicability for studying coastal processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".