Outcomes of patient and public involvement in the development of the Cognitive Decline after Brain Radiosurgery (CoDe B-Rad) study: refining the research question and methodology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Patient and public involvement (PPI) was sought in the development of the protocol for the Cognitive Decline after Brain Radiosurgery (CoDe B-Rad) study, which aims to identify potential side effects of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). PPI served to refine the research question and methodology. DESIGN: PPI. SETTING: PPI conducted online with people based in the UK. The CoDe B-Rad study is running in regional National Health Service tertiary care in the UK and is currently nearing recruitment completion. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and carers with lived experiences of brain radiotherapy. Contributors were identified through national charities. PROCEDURES: Initial focus groups were planned, but participation proved challenging. Instead, online questionnaires, one-to-one discussions and participation in support groups were completed. RESULTS: All contributors experienced changes to their cognition and/or quality of life (QoL) after radiotherapy. Quantifying the side effects of SRS and minimising them were identified as a research gap. Discussion group participation proved challenging. PPI plans were altered to accommodate the physical and mental needs of contributors. It was decided to combine the Montreal Cognitive Assessment along with European Organisation for Research and Treatment in Cancer QLQ-C30 and BN20 to capture cognitive status and QoL of patients with brain metastases and meningiomas after SRS. Patients/carers recommended for sessions to be restricted to 30 min and testing to be offered face-to-face, online, in hospital or at patients' homes. Coproduction was not achievable with our patient population but that did not diminish the input of contributors nor the impact it had on designing the study protocol. CONCLUSIONS: In cancer research, diligent considerations are required to ensure the suitability of involvement methods for this vulnerable population. Flexibility and adaptability of draft PPI plans are essential to achieve meaningful contributions. The protocol of the ongoing CoDe B-Rad study was positively shaped by people with lived experiences of brain radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06466720 (CoDe B-Rad study).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".