What defines response to vagus nerve stimulation in children with drug‐resistant epilepsy? A prospective cohort study from the <scp>CONNECTiVOS</scp> collaboration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Responsiveness to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is often defined based on reduction in seizure frequency, typically at the 50% threshold, with limited consideration to the effects of therapy on seizure severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In the current report, we sought to better characterize the effects of VNS beyond seizure frequency in children with DRE. METHODS: Sixty-seven children from the Connectomic profiling and Vagus nerve stimulation Outcomes Study (CONNECTiVOS) database, a multicenter study including children aged 0-18 who underwent VNS at eight North American centers, were included. Data were collected prospectively at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months after VNS. Seizure outcomes were assessed using the 50% threshold, percentage change in seizure count and change on a frequency timescale, a categorical measure of seizure occurrence (e.g., daily to weekly seizures). The Seizure Severity Questionnaire and the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy were also collected. Linear mixed models were constructed to study longitudinal changes in seizure severity and HRQoL. RESULTS: Among 67 children, 55.2% experienced >50% reduction in seizures, whereas only 37.3% demonstrated reductions in seizure timescales. Notably, 17.9% experienced no reduction in timescales despite meeting the 50% threshold. Furthermore, 31.9% of children experienced a meaningful improvement in seizure severity without any reduction in seizure timescales. HRQoL improvements were driven by the reduction in timescales (mean yearly increase of 3.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-6.52, p = 0.023), rather than responsiveness based on the 50% threshold or percentage change in seizure counts (p > 0.05). Reduced overall seizure severity was also independently associated with higher HRQoL after VNS (p = 0.035). SIGNIFICANCE: The conventional 50% responder threshold failed to capture meaningful gains in HRQoL, which aligned more closely with seizure timescales. Furthermore, nearly one-third of children realized improvements in seizure severity without any reduction in timescales. Improvements in both seizure frequency timescales and seizure severity drive postoperative HRQoL gains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".