MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411711766 · doi:10.1016/j.jma.2025.06.005

Multi-scale simplified residual convolutional neural network model for predicting compositions of binary magnesium alloys

2025· article· en· W4411711766 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Qin, Qinghang Wang, Shouxin Xia, Wang Li, Jiabao Long, Yuhui Zhang, Yanfu Chai, D.L. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnesium and Alloys · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMaterials scienceMagnesiumConvolutional neural networkResidualBinary numberScale (ratio)Artificial neural networkMetallurgyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes a multi-scale simplified residual convolutional neural network (MS-SRCNN) for the precise prediction of Mg-Nd binary alloy compositions from scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. A multi-scale data structure is established by spatially aligning and stacking SEM images at different magnifications. The MS-SRCNN significantly reduces computational runtime by over 90 % compared to traditional architectures like ResNet50, VGG16, and VGG19, without compromising prediction accuracy. The model demonstrates more excellent predictive performance, achieving a >5 % increase in R 2 compared to single-scale models. Furthermore, the MS-SRCNN exhibits robust composition prediction capability across other Mg-based binary alloys, including Mg-La, Mg-Sn, Mg-Ce, Mg-Sm, Mg-Ag, and Mg-Y, thereby emphasizing its generalization and extrapolation potential. This research establishes a non-destructive, microstructure-informed composition analysis framework, reduces characterization time compared to traditional experiment methods and provides insights into the composition-microstructure relationship in diverse material systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnesium and AlloysSame topicAluminum Alloy Microstructure PropertiesFrench-language works237,207