MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411714574 · doi:10.2196/67910

The Digital Library of Health Care Consultations and Simulated Health Care Student Teaching: Protocol for a Repository of Recordings to Support Communication Research

2025· article· en· W4411714574 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elizabeth Sturgiss, Kimberley Norman, Terry Haines, Katrina M. Long, Suzanne Nielsen, Jenny Sim, Aron Shlonsky, Brendan Shannon, Cylie Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careProtocol (science)Resource (disambiguation)Medical educationHRHISMedicineDigital healthNursingHealth educationComputer sciencePublic healthAlternative medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Miscommunication in health care is a major source of poor health outcomes, complaints about health care professionals, and poor patient satisfaction. Recordings from real-life consultations provide valuable data for communication research and education. Additionally, recordings from simulation-based education of health care students can provide valuable data for health care education research. OBJECTIVE: The Digital Library is a data repository supporting high-quality health care communication research. This is the single-source citation for all projects that use the Digital Library in Australia. METHODS: This protocol outlines the logistics and consent process for recording and safely storing the recordings of health care consultations and simulation-based education. The processes are outlined for primary health care settings and health care educational settings as well as for health care narratives from consumers. The repository will be used to answer research questions about health care communication and provide a valuable resource for health care education. RESULTS: Data collection for the Digital Library commenced in 2023 and is ongoing at the time of submission of this protocol. The Digital Library has been approved by Monash University's Human Research Ethics Committee. CONCLUSIONS: The Digital Library will provide a national resource for the study of health care communication in community settings, general practice, and other environments. The health care narratives may be a valuable resource for sharing the patient perspective when living with different conditions. The research that uses this repository will be shared through regular academic channels as well as the community-based dissemination strategies of the National Centre for Healthy Ageing. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/67910.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.132
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.207
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1320.207
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0060.009
Research integrity0.0110.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1440.064

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.258
GPT teacher head0.658
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207