Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article deconstructs the influence of Giorgio Agamben in José Esteban Muñoz’s Cruising Utopia in order to demonstrate the failure of Agamben’s paradigm of (im)potentiality to properly account for the strategies of Muñoz’s queer anarchist (non)politics of disidentification. The work of the undertheorized gay Heideggerian thinker Reiner Schürmann is drawn out to supplement a queer (non)politics latent in both Schürmann and Muñoz. Focusing on the Derridean influences, a constitutive autoimmunity of queer temporality is developed as a means of prefiguring the queer utopia to-come through praxis as pure means. The article closes with Muñoz-inspired reading of the lesbian Blood Sisters, who during the height of the AIDS crisis embodied the queer anarchist praxis identified in Munoz’s Cruising Utopia and Disidentifications. Taken together, the article concludes, politics becomes unassimilable to the queer subject, who is always in excess of signification and actuality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".