MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411722908 · doi:10.1139/as-2024-0085

Documenting Inuit perspectives on the significances of Arctic Char (<i>Salvelinus alpinus</i>; Iqaluppik) in food security, health, and well-being in Nunavik, their dietary preferences, and factors impacting fish quality

2025· article· en· W4411722908 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Sara Bolduc, Mélanie Lemire, Jean‐Sébastien Moore, Lauréanne Dussault-Desrochers, Kathy Aputiarjuk Snowball, Nancy Etok, Kangirsuk Anguvigaq of, Véronique Nadeau, Matthew Little, Tiff‐Annie Kenny, Marianne Falardeau

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalMinistère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des ParcsUniversity of VictoriaUniversité TÉLUQMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts
FundersWeston Family FoundationSentinelle Nord, Université LavalBelmont ForumGenome Canada
KeywordsArctic charSalvelinusArcticFish <Actinopterygii>The arcticQuality (philosophy)FisheryEnvironmental scienceGeographyFood scienceBiologyEcologyTroutOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arctic Char ( Salvelinus alpinus) is a salmonid that is the second-most frequently consumed country food by Inuit in Nunavik, Northern Québec, Canada, valued for its taste, high nutritional quality, and low contaminant levels. However, climate change is increasingly impacting Arctic Char, in a region where food insecurity is highly prevalent. Inuit views on this fish are poorly documented yet provide valuable insights for improving food security and health in a context of changing subsistence fisheries. Guided by a community-based participatory research approach, we conducted interviews, focus groups, and workshops in 2022–2023 with Nunavummiut (Inuit of Nunavik) in Kangiqsualujjuaq, Aupaluk, and Kangirsuk. The objectives were to explore (1) the significance of Arctic Char to Inuit diet, culture, health, and well-being, (2) Inuit preferences regarding body parts, preparation methods, and quality attributes, and (3) Inuit knowledge on factors impacting its quality. Participants shared common views on the significance of Arctic Char. Environmental conditions, fish behavior, and fishing methods were linked to the quality of Arctic Char and Inuit-related dietary preferences. Gender roles and generational shifts were highlighted throughout discussions. Inuit shared resilient strategies when facing less preferred fish characteristics, which could help addressing the expected challenges related to climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic ScienceSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207