P102 Raising the bar of efficacy in atopic dermatitis: lebrikizumab provides deep clinical and itch responses up to 16 weeks (ADvantage study)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ciclosporin A (CsA) is indicated for the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD), but its efficacy may not be optimal and its safety limits longer-term use. Lebrikizumab (LEB) is a high-affinity anti-interleukin-13 monoclonal antibody. In the ADvantage study (NCT05149313), LEB was dosed 250 mg every 2 weeks and administered with topical corticosteroids (TCS). At week 16 this regimen had significantly improved signs and symptoms of AD in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD inadequately controlled or ineligible for CsA, with an acceptable safety profile. We report the 16-week deep response of LEB combined with low-to-mid-potency TCS in patients with moderate-to-severe AD inadequately controlled or noneligible for CsA in the phase III ADvantage study. This study had a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled period plus a 36-week open-label period. Eligible patients were adults and adolescents (aged ≥ 12 to < 18 years) with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 3, and ≥ 10% body surface area affected, who were not adequately controlled with or not eligible for CsA. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to LEB 250 mg every 2 weeks with a loading dose of LEB 500 mg at baseline and week 2, or PBO (every 2 weeks). Deep response was defined as having clear skin (IGA 0 and 100% improvement in EASI: EASI 100) or no or minimal itch [pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) 0 or 1]. The percentage of patients achieving IGA 0, EASI 100 and pruritus NRS 0/1 at week 16 was reported. Missing data due to lack of efficacy or data after rescue medication usage (high-potency TCS or systemic treatment) were set to baseline and considered nonresponse. Other missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. In total, 331 patients were randomized (220 LEB+TCS and 111 PBO+TCS). Around 17% of patients had been previously exposed to dupilumab. At week 16, a higher proportion of patients receiving LEB+TCS vs. PBO+TCS achieved IGA 0 (16.0% vs. 5.0%, P < 0.01), EASI 100 (15.8% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001) and pruritus NRS 0/1 (29.9% vs. 8.3%, P < 0.01). After 16 weeks of treatment, LEB led to deep skin response in > 15% of patients and deep itch response in close to 30% of patients. Deep response is therefore achievable with LEB in the short term, even in this difficult-to-treat population. Almirall, S.A. has licensed the rights to develop and commercialize lebrikizumab for the treatment of dermatology indications, including atopic dermatitis, in Europe. Lilly has exclusive rights for the development and commercialization of lebrikizumab in the USA and the rest of the world outside of Europe. Medical writing was funded by Almirall S.A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".