MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411733095 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljaf085.130

P102 Raising the bar of efficacy in atopic dermatitis: lebrikizumab provides deep clinical and itch responses up to 16 weeks (ADvantage study)

2025· article· en· W4411733095 on OpenAlexaff
Richard B. Warren, Marjolein de Bruin‐Weller, Athanasios Tsianakas, A. Khemis, Jacek C Szepietowski, Chih-ho Hong, J. Valls, Víctor Sapena, Helena Agell, Èric Massana, Yanislav Mihaylov, Stephan Weidinger

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtopic dermatitisMedicineDermatologyBar (unit)Raising (metalworking)Materials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ciclosporin A (CsA) is indicated for the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD), but its efficacy may not be optimal and its safety limits longer-term use. Lebrikizumab (LEB) is a high-affinity anti-interleukin-13 monoclonal antibody. In the ADvantage study (NCT05149313), LEB was dosed 250 mg every 2 weeks and administered with topical corticosteroids (TCS). At week 16 this regimen had significantly improved signs and symptoms of AD in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD inadequately controlled or ineligible for CsA, with an acceptable safety profile. We report the 16-week deep response of LEB combined with low-to-mid-potency TCS in patients with moderate-to-severe AD inadequately controlled or noneligible for CsA in the phase III ADvantage study. This study had a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled period plus a 36-week open-label period. Eligible patients were adults and adolescents (aged ≥ 12 to < 18 years) with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 3, and ≥ 10% body surface area affected, who were not adequately controlled with or not eligible for CsA. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to LEB 250 mg every 2 weeks with a loading dose of LEB 500 mg at baseline and week 2, or PBO (every 2 weeks). Deep response was defined as having clear skin (IGA 0 and 100% improvement in EASI: EASI 100) or no or minimal itch [pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) 0 or 1]. The percentage of patients achieving IGA 0, EASI 100 and pruritus NRS 0/1 at week 16 was reported. Missing data due to lack of efficacy or data after rescue medication usage (high-potency TCS or systemic treatment) were set to baseline and considered nonresponse. Other missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. In total, 331 patients were randomized (220 LEB+TCS and 111 PBO+TCS). Around 17% of patients had been previously exposed to dupilumab. At week 16, a higher proportion of patients receiving LEB+TCS vs. PBO+TCS achieved IGA 0 (16.0% vs. 5.0%, P < 0.01), EASI 100 (15.8% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001) and pruritus NRS 0/1 (29.9% vs. 8.3%, P < 0.01). After 16 weeks of treatment, LEB led to deep skin response in > 15% of patients and deep itch response in close to 30% of patients. Deep response is therefore achievable with LEB in the short term, even in this difficult-to-treat population. Almirall, S.A. has licensed the rights to develop and commercialize lebrikizumab for the treatment of dermatology indications, including atopic dermatitis, in Europe. Lilly has exclusive rights for the development and commercialization of lebrikizumab in the USA and the rest of the world outside of Europe. Medical writing was funded by Almirall S.A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207