Bibliographic record
Abstract
Personal Relationships, first published in 1994, is a flagship journal of the International Association for Relationship Research.PR is a premier international, interdisciplinary journal promoting rigorous empirical scholarship that tests and advances theory on how people interact to create, maintain, and dissolve short-and long-term bonds.Innovative articles from distinguished scholars use a wide variety of methodologies and reflect multiple disciplines, including but not limited to psychology, communication studies, family studies, human development, gerontology, sociology, social work, anthropology, and health.The intellectually rich, highquality content of Personal Relationships will interest researchers, practitioners, and educators.Manuscripts examining diverse personal relationships, including those between romantic or intimate partners, parents and children, siblings, and other close-relationship partners are welcome.Published work typically focuses on attributes of individual partners within relationships (e.g., personality factors or social positions as influences on relationship outcomes) at all stages of the life course, interactive relationship processes (i.e., behavioral, affective, or cognitive), the internal structure of dyads and networks, and relationships in social contexts (e.g., families, workplaces, institutions, historical periods, cultures).Besides original quantitative or qualitative research, PR welcomes other contributions such as theoretical or methodological treatises, systematic integrative reviews, metaanalyses, and critical assessments of the field.Studies with community samples (especially of understudied populations from different regions of the world), longitudinal designs, dyadic analyses, and measures that go beyond self-report (e.g., behavioral observation, physiological measures) are especially encouraged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.326 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".