MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411744189 · doi:10.1007/s13272-025-00861-y

Relative kinematics for a jerk-level trajectory generation system

2025· article· en· W4411744189 on OpenAlexaff
Zoe Mbikayi, Agnes Steinert, Philippe Rudolph, Dominik Heimsch, Florian Holzapfel, Hugh H. T. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCEAS Aeronautical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersTechnische Universität München
KeywordsJerkKinematicsTrajectoryControl theory (sociology)PhysicsComputer scienceClassical mechanicsArtificial intelligenceAcceleration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Using electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft for urban air mobility requires a high level of maneuverability and tracking accuracy from the flight guidance systems. This can be achieved by constructing a high-order desired trajectory, in order to provide jerk-level feedforward commands and acceleration-level relative kinematics. In this paper, we perform a noise analysis on a trajectory system where relative kinematics are computed numerically, and we show the resulting noise effects. We then present an analytical alternative which improves the noise sensitivity. Additionally, we develop a smoothing strategy for obtaining a high-order parametrization of a trajectory designed with low-order clothoid curves. The methods presented in the paper are tested and validated in closed-loop simulations and through flight tests on a 700 kg medical-evacuation eVTOL aircraft. The results of these tests are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEAS Aeronautical JournalSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207