A century of allopatry: plasticity and rapid selection shape phenotypic trait variability under contrasting environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allopatric isolation under contrasting environments can drive rapid phenotypic divergence, even over contemporary timescales. Rapid changes in morphology or physiology can allow organisms to adapt to biotic and abiotic characteristics of their habitats. While studying metabolism, growth and resource needs may allow us to understand adaptation to several selective pressures, these traits are rarely jointly considered. We investigated morphological, growth and metabolic divergence in two allopatric populations of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) sharing a common evolutionary origin but inhabiting contrasting environments. We combined field observations, common garden and quantitative genetic approaches to disentangle contributions of genetic divergence and plasticity to phenotypic variability. Wild adults differed in body shape and growth trajectories, potentially reflecting plasticity related to resource availability and temperature variations. Under common garden conditions, juveniles displayed inter-population differences in routine metabolic rate, its allometric scaling with body mass. These patterns suggest divergent selection on physiological traits. Despite low neutral genetic differentiation, phenotypic divergence unfolded in less than 100 years, suggesting that plasticity and selection can promote rapid multi-trait changes. These findings highlight that considering changes in physiological, growth and morphological traits can reveal the adaptive potential of small, isolated populations facing rapid environmental change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".