MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411784024 · doi:10.1097/cxa.0000000000000241

Exploring Factors that Impact Provider Experience while Caring for Pregnant People Who Use Substances in Ontario: A Qualitative Descriptive Phenomenology

2025· article· en· W4411784024 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Magda Kalff-Duschenes, Kate Alison Hodgson, Emily Groot, Geoff Bardwell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Addiction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversityUniversity of VictoriaVancouver Coastal HealthUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenomenology (philosophy)Qualitative researchDescriptive researchLived experiencePsychologyMedicineSociologyPsychotherapistSocial scienceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Objectives: Existing literature on the experiences of health care providers caring for pregnant people who use drugs suggests that providers do not enjoy their work, and describes discordant relationships between providers and patients, and major deficits of time, training, and resources. Little is known about the factors that lead to improved experiences for providers caring for pregnant people who use drugs. This research aims to understand the factors that affect the subjectively experienced phenomenon of providing health and social services for pregnant people who use drugs in Ontario. Methods: We conducted structured interviews with social service and health care providers from across Ontario who had worked with pregnant people who use drugs at some point over the last year. Interviews focused on provider philosophy of care, past training and education, organizational practices, and general experience. We utilized a descriptive phenomenological qualitative methodology and interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results: We interviewed 7 providers. Overall, the majority of participants described enjoyment in their work and were passionate about the care of their patients. Factors that impacted experience were categorized into personal-level (philosophy, personal experience), interpersonal-level (relationships, trust), community-level (interdisciplinary care networks), and structural-level (marginalization, underfunding) factors. Conclusions: Personal-, interpersonal-, and community-level factors generally improved the experience of providers, while structural factors impeded positive experiences. To improve the experience of providers in a widespread manner, structural factors must be addressed, as personal-, interpersonal-, and community-level factors have limited potential for widespread change. Objectifs: La littérature existante sur les expériences des prestataires de soins de santé qui s’occupent des personnes enceintes qui consomment des drogues suggère que les prestataires n’apprécient pas leur travail, et décrit des relations discordantes entre les prestataires et les patients, ainsi que des déficits importants en termes de temps, de formation et de ressources. On sait peu de choses sur les facteurs qui améliorent l’expérience des prestataires de soins aux personnes enceintes qui consomment des drogues. Cette recherche vise à comprendre les facteurs qui affectent le phénomène subjectivement expérimenté de la prestation de services sociaux et de santé aux personnes enceintes qui consomment des drogues en Ontario. Méthodes: Nous avons mené des entretiens structurés avec des prestataires de services sociaux et de santé à travers l’Ontario qui avaient travaillé avec des personnes enceintes qui ont consommées des drogues à un moment ou à un autre au cours de l’année écoulée. Les entretiens ont porté sur la philosophie de soins des prestataires, leur formation et leur éducation antérieures, leurs pratiques organisationnelles et leur expérience générale. Nous avons utilisé une méthodologie qualitative phénoménologique descriptive et les transcriptions des entretiens ont été analysées de manière thématique. Résultats: Nous avons interrogé 7 prestataires. Dans l’ensemble, la majorité des participants ont indiqué qu’ils aimaient leur travail et qu’ils étaient passionnés par les soins prodigués à leurs patients. Les facteurs qui ont eu un impact sur l’expérience ont été catégorisés au niveau personnel (philosophie, expérience personnelle), au niveau interpersonnel (relations, confiance), au niveau communautaire (réseaux de soins interdisciplinaires) et au niveau structurel (marginalisation, sous-financement). Conclusions: Les facteurs personnels, interpersonnels et communautaires ont généralement amélioré l’expérience des prestataires, tandis que les facteurs structurels ont entravé les expériences positives. Afin d’améliorer l’expérience des prestataires de manière généralisée, les facteurs structurels doivent être abordés, car les facteurs personnels, interpersonnels et communautaires ont un potentiel limité de changement généralisé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of AddictionSame topicPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFrench-language works237,207