MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411786107 · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.6003

Osteoporosis

2025· article· en· W4411786107 on OpenAlexaff
Suzanne N. Morin, William D. Leslie, John T. Schousboe

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoporosisFRAXTeriparatideBone mineralHip fractureInternal medicineRheumatoid arthritisBone densitySurgeryOsteoporotic fracture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass, increased bone fragility, and increased susceptibility to fracture, which is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and economic costs. Worldwide, 1 in 3 women and 1 in 5 men older than 50 years of age experience osteoporotic fractures in their lifetime. Observations: Risk factors for osteoporosis include older age, female sex, prior fractures, prior falls, low body weight, history of hip fracture in a parent, glucocorticoid use, cigarette smoking, excess alcohol consumption, certain comorbidities (eg, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic liver and kidney disease), and low level of bone mineral density (BMD; measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). The fracture risk assessment algorithm combines these clinical risk factors and BMD measurement to estimate the 10-year absolute fracture risk for hip, spine, shoulder, and forearm fractures. For patients at high risk of fracture, such as those with a T score of -2.5 or less (equivalent to a bone mass that is ≥2.5 SDs below that of young adults) for BMD, history of vertebral or hip fracture, multiple fractures, or high 10-year absolute fracture risk (eg, ≥20%), antiresorptive agents (bisphosphonates or, if contraindicated, denosumab) are recommended to reduce vertebral fractures (risk difference, -52 [95% CI, -95 to -18 per 1000 person-years]) and hip fractures (risk difference, -6 [95% CI, -11 to -1 per 1000 person-years]). Anabolic medications (teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab) should be considered in very high-risk individuals (eg, recent vertebral fractures, hip fracture with a T score of ≤-2.5 for BMD), followed by an antiresorptive agent. The use of fracture liaison services (comprehensive inpatient or outpatient management program for patients after a fracture) was shown to increase medication initiation and adherence by 38% compared with 17% for patients who did not receive fracture liaison services (risk difference, 20% [95% CI, 16% to 25%]) and these benefits may reduce the rates of subsequent fracture. Patients are recommended to follow appropriate intake of calcium (1000 to 1200 mg) and vitamin D (600 to 800 IU) guidelines and to pursue a regimen of muscle resistance exercises (eg, squats, push-ups) and balance exercises (eg, heel raises, standing on 1 foot). Conclusions and Relevance: Osteoporosis is a common condition among older adults that leads to increased susceptibility to fracture, which is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Antiresorptive agents such as bisphosphonates or denosumab are recommended for patients at high fracture risk. Anabolic treatment with parathyroid hormone analogs (such as teriparatide and abaloparatide) and sclerostin inhibitors (such as romosozumab) can be considered for very high-risk individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMASame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207