MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411786501 · doi:10.1002/ange.202506507

Symmetry Breaking Enabled Stable Oxygen Redox in Li‐Rich Cathodes via π‐Type Interaction

2025· article· en· W4411786501 on OpenAlexaff
Fu‐Da Yu, Zhe-Jian Yi, Hainan Wang, Jia‐Zhen Zhao, Yangqian Zhang, Jigang Zhou, Jihuai Wu, Zhang Lan, Yiming Xie, Lan‐Fang Que, Zhen‐Bo Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Fujian ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRedoxSymmetry breakingChemistryOxygenChemical physicsInorganic chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Effectively stabilizing oxygen redox is the most challenging task for the practical applications of high‐energy‐density Li‐rich cathode materials. However, how to accurately tune the oxygen energy level to achieve reversible redox remains puzzling so far. In this work, we achieve stable oxygen redox in layered Li‐rich materials over the whole voltage range without irreversible O2 release by adjusting the interlayer metal cation environment adjacent to the ligand. Combining synchrotron X‐ray absorption spectroscopy and theoretical analysis of metal‐ligand orbital combinations, we confirm the obvious charge transfer from O to Ni due to the π‐type interaction between Ni 3d spin‐down t2g orbitals and O 2p orbitals. Furthermore, Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations reveal the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the Ni coordination environment after Li extraction under the π‐type interaction, which enhances the intrinsic competition between anion and cation oxidation, keeping π* state (from O 2p splitting) below the metal band to avoid over‐oxidation. As a result, the modified material shows improved electrochemical performance and stable structural/interface evolution. This work provides new insights into the relationship between the adjacent metal environment and the ligand O redox reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→