MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411791790 · doi:10.2196/69842

Health System–Level Implementation of Digital Health Support for People Living With HIV and Substance Use Disorders: Protocol for a Cluster-Randomized, Stepped-Wedge Clinical Trial

2025· article· en· W4411791790 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ryan P. Westergaard, Hailey K Ballard, Rachel E. Gicquelais, Cynthia Firnhaber, R A Miller, Melanie Wolman, Cameron Liebert, Emily Steeley, Marlon P. Mundt, Linda Park, Andrew Quanbeck

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Drug Abuse
KeywordsPreprintRandomized controlled trialCluster (spacecraft)Protocol (science)MedicineDigital healthClinical trialPsychologyGerontologyFamily medicineHealth careAlternative medicineComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: People living with HIV who are affected by substance use disorders and other social vulnerabilities are less likely to achieve and sustain viral suppression. Supporting these patients with mobile health systems can provide additional social and behavioral support that may improve HIV outcomes in these populations. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to implement and evaluate an evidence-based digital health system (antiretroviral therapy care coordination; ART-C) to improve HIV viral suppression and reduce missed clinic visits within a multisite HIV care program. METHODS: ART-C will be implemented in 8 HIV medical home clinics operated by Vivent Health in Colorado, Missouri, Texas, and Wisconsin. All patients receiving HIV care across the system will be invited to use a customized version of the Connections smartphone app to join a virtual community of peers living with HIV. A subset of patients with substance use disorder will be recruited to use enhanced features of the app, allowing sharing of information about substance use and other social determinants of health with their care team. Effectiveness and implementation outcomes will be evaluated using a stepped-wedge clinical trial design. Effectiveness will be evaluated by comparing missed visits and viral nonsuppression rates before and after the intervention. Implementation will be evaluated using a mixed methods approach based on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. RESULTS: Funding was received April 2022 with data collection beginning December 6, 2023. Data collection is anticipated to end in 2027 with data analysis and results expected late 2027. As of submission of the manuscript, 86 participants were recruited. Of the 6710 patients with health record data available 2 years before the trial began, 1723 (25.68%) had a substance use disorder, 2825 (42.1%) missed at least 2 care visits, and 1354 (20.18%) had at least 1 detectable HIV RNA test (viral load ≥200 copies/mL), leaving 3816 (56.87%) eligible individuals. Analysis of preimplementation data demonstrated that patients had a mean of 4.1 (SD 2.1) to 7.8 (SD 5.5) care visits across all 8 Vivent Health sites, with 45% to 70% of patients missing at least 1 visit. Patients underwent a mean of 2.2 to 4 HIV RNA tests, and 14% to 37% of patients across clinics had at least 1 nonsuppressed HIV RNA result. Primary analyses are expected to be completed by 2028. CONCLUSIONS: This study will evaluate the effectiveness of and implementation strategies for a mobile health-based intervention to support patients with HIV, substance use disorder, and related challenges in engaging in care and achieving viral suppression. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/69842.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.006
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0900.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.284
GPT teacher head0.619
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research Protocols→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→