MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411792934 · doi:10.18280/ts.420330

A Federated Learning-Integrated Autoencoder Model for Robust and Decentralized Pneumonia Detection in Chest X-Rays

2025· article· en· W4411792934 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amit Kumar Chandanan, Vandana Roy, Vijay Birchha, C. Raja, Akshay Varkale, Musaddak Maher Abdul Zahra, Pankaj Agarwal, Santosh K. Vishwakarma

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderPneumoniaComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMedicineDeep learningInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel pneumonia detection system integrates Federated Learning (FL) with autoencoders to address data scarcity and privacy concerns commonly faced in medical diagnostics.Traditional pneumonia detection relies on supervised learning methods primarily Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transfer learning which require large, labelled datasets stored centrally, raising significant ethical and privacy challenges.In contrast, the proposed system leverages FL to enable collaborative model training across multiple medical institutions without sharing sensitive patient data.Autoencoders further enhance the model's ability to learn effectively from limited labelled data, improving its generalization in real-world clinical settings.Performance evaluations demonstrate that this approach outperforms existing models in detecting pneumonia from chest X-ray images, achieving superior accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.Specifically, the model reaches an accuracy of 95.15%, a precision of 95.8%, and a recall of 98.35%, significantly exceeding results from conventional CNN and transfer learning-based methods.The system not only delivers high diagnostic accuracy but also promotes ethical data handling by eliminating the need for centralized data storage.Overall, this solution addresses the critical limitations of traditional diagnostic frameworks and sets the foundation for secure, privacy-preserving, AI-driven clinical tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207