MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411795973 · doi:10.2196/73631

Probability-Based Early Warning for Seasonal Influenza in China: Model Development Study

2025· article· en· W4411795973 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinzhao Cui, Ting Zhang, Xiaoli Wang, Liuyang Yang, Xuefeng Huang, Weizhong Yang, Zhongjie Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintWarning systemChinaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Seasonal influenzaEarly warning systemComputer scienceEnvironmental healthMedicineGeographyTelecommunicationsWorld Wide WebInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Seasonal influenza is a major global public health concern, leading to escalated morbidity and mortality rates. Traditional early warning models rely on binary (0/1) classification methods, which issue alerts only when predefined thresholds are crossed. However, these models exhibit inflexibility, often leading to false alarms or missed warnings and failing to provide granular risk assessments essential for decision-making. Therefore, we propose a probability-based early warning system using machine learning to mitigate these limitations and to offer continuous risk estimations of alerts (0-1 variable) instead of rigid threshold-based alerts. Based on probabilistic prediction, public health experts can make more flexible decisions in combination with the actual situation, significantly reducing the uncertainty and pressure in the decision-making process and reducing the waste of public health resources and the risk of social panic. Objective: The main aim of this study is to devise an innovative approach for early warning systems focused on influenza-like cases. Therefore, a Dense Residual Network (Dense ResNet), a supervised deep learning model, was developed. The model's training involved fitting the influenza-like illness positive rate, which enabled the early detection and warning of signals of changes occurring in the activity level of influenza-like cases. This departure from conventional methodologies underscores the transformative potential of machine learning, particularly in providing advanced capabilities for timely and proactive warnings in the context of influenza outbreaks. Methods: We developed a Dense ResNet machine learning model trained on influenza surveillance data from Northern and Southern China (2014-2024). This model generates early warning signals 3, 5, and 7 days in advance, providing a probability-based risk assessment represented as a continuous variable ranging from 0 to 1, in contrast to the traditional binary (0/1) warning systems. We evaluated the performance of this model using area under the curve scores, accuracy, recall, and F1-scores, then compared it with support vector machine (SVM), random forests, XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boosting), and LSTM (long short-term memory) models. Results: The Dense ResNet model demonstrated the best performance, characterized by 5-day lead warnings and a 50th percentile probability threshold, achieving area under the curve scores of 0.94 (Northern China) and 0.95 (Southern China). Relative to traditional models, probability-based warning signals improved early detection, reduced false alarms, and facilitated tiered public health responses. Conclusions: This study presented a novel probability-based machine learning model essential for early warning signals of influenza, demonstrating superior accuracy, flexibility, and practical applicability compared to other techniques. This approach enhances preparedness for influenza among the population and promotes the use of automated artificial intelligence-driven public health responses by replacing binary warnings with probability-driven risk assessments. Future research should integrate real-time surveillance data and dynamic transmission models to improve the precision of early warning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207