MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411799273 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3584126

Scale- and Shape-Aware Network With Prediction Decoupling for Building Fine-Grained Change Detection

2025· article· en· W4411799273 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaxin Wang, Chengcai Leng, Mingwei Zhang, Xi Li, Irene Cheng, Anup Basu, Licheng Jiao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceScale (ratio)Change detectionRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceData miningGeologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Building change detection (BCD) is a hot topic in geoscience and remote sensing (RS) with widespread applications. However, most existing BCD methods only focus on areas where changes have occurred, but ignore the change statuses. To address this problem, a building fine-grained change detection (BFCD) task is further explored in this work, which aims to judge the time-related “disappeared”, “appeared”, and “rebuilt” change types of buildings. Meanwhile, a scale- and shape-aware network (S2Net) with prediction decoupling is designed. Firstly, a prediction decoupling framework with dual decoders is built to ensure the prediction consistency with the temporal order of bi-temporal images. Secondly, considering the rebuilt type is the changes between building instances, which are often reflected in the scale and shape differences of the buildings. Thereby, a scale-aware module (ScAM) and a shape-aware module (ShAM) are designed. These two modules help extract the discriminative features of buildings with different scales and shapes for subsequent change detection (CD). In addition, two BCD datasets widely used, LEVIR-CD+ and WHU-CD, are relabeled in this work to support the study of BFCD. Experimental results show that S2Net achieves competitive performance, and its effectiveness is confirmed. The code and datasets will be publicly available at https://github.com/ptdoge/S2Net.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207