Primary Aldosteronism and Cognitive Dysfunction: A Case-Control Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Primary aldosteronism is characterized by elevated aldosterone levels, leading to adverse effects such as hypertension, hypokalaemia and increased risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Aldosterone impacts the central nervous system by promoting vascular remodelling and oxidative stress, potentially impairing cognitive function. The presence of mineralocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus, a key region for cognition, further suggest a link between primary aldosteronism and cognitive dysfunction. This study aims to further explore the association between hyperaldosteronism and cognitive impairment. Methods: In this pilot study we examined 15 individuals with primary aldosteronism and arterial hypertension alongside 15 age- and sex-matched controls with essential hypertension, all free of previous cerebrovascular events. Clinical and archival laboratory data were obtained. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Results: Participants with primary aldosteronism had higher blood pressure values, longer duration of hypertension, lower serum potassium levels and higher 24 h urine albumin excretion rate compared to controls. Comorbidities, other characteristics and laboratory values were comparable across the two groups. No differences were observed in Mini-Mental State Examination scores, but Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were significantly lower in the primary aldosteronism group (25.1 ± 2.2 vs. 27.1 ± 2.2, p = 0.021). Trends of poorer performance in language and attention/executive function domains were noted in primary aldosteronism individuals, as well as a higher number of pathological Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (7 vs. 3). No significant correlations were found between cognitive test results and aldosterone concentrations or blood pressure in primary aldosteronism group. However, importantly, multiple regression analysis showed that aldosterone levels have a significant impact on Montreal Cognitive Assessment test, independent of blood pressure or duration of hypertension. Conclusions: This study supports an association between hyperaldosteronism and cognitive dysfunction, underscoring the need for more active detection and targeted treatment of primary aldosteronism. These findings warrant further research in larger cohorts to better elucidate this relationship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".