Walking out of the shadows: Exploring the complexities of motherhood and intergenerational realities in the families of three Taiwanese comfort women survivors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have found that Taiwanese comfort women survivors faced multiple forms of trauma from the comfort women system, and that societal prejudice against women's sexual victimization further impacted their marriages. However, there is minimal research exploring how sexual trauma may have impacted comfort women survivors' experiences of motherhood, alongside the consequences of survivors' experiences on subsequent generations. This article explores the perceptions of eight family members, including the second and third generations, of three deceased Taiwanese Han-Chinese ethnicity comfort women survivors. In particular, we trace family members' perspectives of survivors' mothering, and how family members were impacted by their mother's experiences as a comfort woman. To ensure participants' anonymity, findings are presented using composite narratives. The narratives illustrate the ways in which survivors' sexual trauma reportedly impacted survivors' family formation and mothering, and had long-term effects on survivors' offspring. According to family members, ambivalent mother-daughter relationships and conflictual relationships resulting from the preferential treatment of the male offspring were found. In addition, family members' psychological well-being, marriages, personality, and parenting were impacted by survivors' sexual trauma and conflictual family dynamics. Nevertheless, participants showed great strength and capacity under challenging circumstances and actively undertook their healing journey. We highlight the importance of providing culture-driven multilayered services for the families of comfort women survivors to foster intergenerational resilience, enabling them to continue to "walk out of the shadows" of conflict-related sexual violence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".