MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411839943 · doi:10.11648/j.cajph.20251103.13

Factors Associated with Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Among Management School Students in Senegal

2025· article· en· W4411839943 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gad Namndiro, Jean Augustin Diégane Tine, Abdourahmane Sow, Ibrahima Seck

Bibliographic record

VenueCentral African Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotional Intelligence and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsAnxietyDepression (economics)PsychologyStress (linguistics)Clinical psychologyStress managementPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mental health among students in Senegal remains an under-explored area, with limited research and prevention efforts. At the African Center for Higher Studies in Management (CESAG), students face high academic demands, highlighting the importance of investigating stress, anxiety, and depression within this population. This study aimed to identify factors associated with anxiety-depressive states, specifically stress, anxiety and depression, among CESAG students. A cross-sectional, observational, descriptive, and analytical study was conducted from July 22 to August 23, 2024. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire. Stress, anxiety, and depression were assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score, respectively. Data analysis was performed using RStudio (version 2024.12.1.563). Informed and voluntary consent of the participants was ensured. A total of 426 students completed the online questionnaire. The mean age was 23.4 years. Stress was observed in 45.6% of students, anxiety in 21.4%, and depression in 35.4%. Risk factors for stress included belonging to the [20-25 years[ age group (ORa = 5.68, 95%CI [1.67-19.31]) or the ≥30 years group (ORa = 8.8, 95%CI [1.5-51.64]), poor sleep quality (ORa = 7.05, 95%CI [2.32-21.44]), low financial income (ORa = 11.23, 95%CI [4.34-29.06]), low self-esteem (ORa = 15.13, 95%CI [3.18-72.13]) or moderate self-esteem (ORa = 7.96, 95%CI [2.83-22.4]), a negative emotional state (ORa = 4.7, 95%CI [1.64-13.46]), and the absence of physical activity (ORa = 5.03, 95%CI [1.88-13.49]). Living alone was a protective factor against anxiety among students (ORa = 0.16, 95%CI [0.09-0.29]). Depression was associated with several risk factors: poor sleep quality (ORa = 8.07, 95%CI [2.72-23.88]), low financial income (ORa = 4.38, 95%CI [1.42-13.48]), living alone (ORa = 3.53, 95%CI [1.1-11.34]), poor diet (ORa = 13.03, 95%CI [3.84-44.18]), low self-esteem (ORa = 18.21; 95%CI [2.62-126.41]) or moderate self-esteem (ORa = 9.19, 95%CI [1.66-51.01]), and a negative emotional state (ORa = 5.54, 95%CI [1.64-18.71]). A passive coping style was found to be protective (ORa = 0.25, 95%CI [0.08-0.8]). These findings emphasize the importance of preventive strategies to promote CESAG students’ mental health and well-being. Targeted awareness campaigns and psychological support are essential to achieving this goal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCentral African Journal of Public HealthSame topicEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207