MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411842837 · doi:10.2147/dddt.s502910

Dose-Dependent Effects of Remimazolam on Early Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery

2025· article· en· W4411842837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhen-Qi Liu, Xinyu Zhang, Xuebin Wang, Ziyang Liu, Yong Pang

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Design Development and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeurocognitivePerioperativeColorectal cancerLaparoscopic surgeryCancerLaparoscopySurgeryAnesthesiaInternal medicinePsychiatryCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To study the effect of different doses of remimazolam on the maintenance of anesthesia and its impact on postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods: A total of 120 elderly patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery under general anesthesia (both sexes included, ASA grade (II-III) were randomly assigned to experimental groups (R1-R3) and control group (P), with 30 cases per group. The experimental groups received different remimazolam maintenance doses: R1 (0.5 mg/kg/h), R2 (1.0 mg/kg/h), and R3 (1.5 mg/kg/h), while the control group received propofol for sedation. Perioperative cognitive function was evaluated using MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) and MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) preoperatively, and on postoperative days 3 and 7, to analyze differences in cognitive effects and safety profiles of remimazolam across the four groups. Results: A total of 117 patients were ultimately included, with 3 excluded due to intraoperative conversion to open surgery. Participants were randomly allocated into four groups according to remimazolam maintenance dosing regimens: 30 in the R1 group, 28 in the R2 group, 30 in the R3 group, and 29 in the P group.There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative cognitive function scores between the R2 and R3 groups, and both groups had scores that were significantly higher than those of the R1 and P groups, with statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Compared to propofol, remimazolam at medium and high doses can reduce the incidence of perioperative neurocognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. High-dose remimazolam anesthesia maintenance may prolong extubation time, increase the incidence of postoperative shivering, and potentially lead to re-sedation after awakening, so medium-dose remimazolam is more suitable for intraoperative anesthesia maintenance in elderly patients without increasing the incidence of adverse events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug Design Development and TherapySame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207