Analysis of Long‐Term Function and Survival of Edaravone Oral Suspension–Treated Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Using <scp>PRO</scp>‐<scp>ACT</scp> Data as Historical Placebo Controls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: On/Off dosing of intravenous (IV) edaravone and edaravone oral suspension was US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) treatment. Placebo-controlled trials showed that IV edaravone slows the rate of physical functional decline in patients with ALS. Here, the impact of edaravone oral suspension on function and survival was assessed. METHODS: Edaravone oral suspension was investigated in clinical trials MT-1186-A01/A02/A03/A04. Patients from Studies MT-1186-A02/A04 (prespecified analysis) and Studies MT-1186-A01/A02/A03/A04 (post hoc analysis) were propensity score matched 1:1 on 10 baseline variables with historical Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials (PRO-ACT) placebo patients (not receiving active investigational treatment in their trials) to assess the impact of edaravone oral suspension on function and survival. RESULTS: In the prespecified analysis, 78 edaravone oral suspension-treated patients from Studies MT-1186-A02/A04 demonstrated a survival benefit versus 78 matched PRO-ACT placebo patients (p = 0.005). Baseline risk-adjusted hazard ratio showed an 84% decreased risk of death in edaravone oral suspension versus PRO-ACT placebo patients (p = 0.005). ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score change from baseline at Week 48 was -8.4 points for edaravone oral suspension versus -14.1 points for PRO-ACT placebo patients (p < 0.001). In the post hoc analysis, patients from Studies MT-1186-A01/A02/A03/A04 (n = 210) propensity score matched to PRO-ACT placebo patients (n = 210) showed statistically significantly longer time to death and smaller ALSFRS-R change from baseline at Week 48; restricted mean survival time showed a 7.3-month improvement (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This suggests edaravone oral suspension significantly increases survival time and decreases physical functional decline versus PRO-ACT placebo patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".