MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411856840 · doi:10.1177/17474930251357739

Recanalization of basilar artery occlusion during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy

2025· article· en· W4411856840 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grace Adwane, Maarten G. Lansberg, Simon Liebart, Frédérique Charbonneau, Marc S. Schwartz, Jeremy J. Heit, Michael Mlynash, Denis Sablot, Anne Wacongne, Jean‐Philippe Desilles, Vincent Costalat, Michaël Obadia, Carole Henry, Éric Manchon, Caroline Arquizan, Gregory W. Albers, Adrien ter Schiphorst, Pierre Seners

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Stroke · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPhilippe FoundationNIH Clinical CenterNational Institutes of HealthFulbright AssociationRotary Foundation
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisBasilar arteryOcclusionStroke (engine)Logistic regressionInternal medicineCardiologySurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients with acute ischemic stroke and a large vessel occlusion admitted to non-endovascular capable centers frequently require inter-hospital transfer to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for thrombectomy. Data regarding arterial recanalization of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) during transfer are lacking. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data of acute stroke patients with BAO transferred for consideration of thrombectomy to three CSCs (Rothschild Hospital, France; Montpellier Hospital, France; Stanford Hospital, USA) between 2016 and 2024, with arterial imaging at the referring hospital and on CSC arrival. Inter-hospital recanalization was assessed by comparison of the baseline and post-transfer arterial imaging and was defined as 2a-3 on the modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale. Independent predictors of inter-hospital recanalization were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 228 patients were included: median age 71 years, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 14, transfer time of 3.5 h, and 39% of patients received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before transfer. The primary reason for withholding IVT was late presentation. Inter-hospital BAO recanalization occurred in 15% of patients. Variables independently associated with inter-hospital BAO recanalization were IVT use (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 24.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.9-85.5, P < 0.01), distal BAO site (aOR = 2.9, 1.0-8.5, P = 0.05), lack of diabetes (aOR = 11.4, 1.4-93.2, P = 0.02), and non-atheromatous etiology (aOR = 6.6, 1.4-31.4, P = 0.02). BAO recanalization rates ranged from 1% in non–IVT-treated patients with proximal BAO to 45% in IVT-treated patients with distal BAO. Inter-hospital recanalization was associated with an increased odds of good functional outcome (odds ratio (OR) for 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) = 0-2 = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.2-8.8, P = 0.02, adjusted for age, pre-stroke mRS, baseline NIHSS, Posterior Circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECTS), IVT use, and onset-to-imaging time). Conclusions: BAO recanalization during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy occurred in 15% of patients and was associated with a favorable 3-month outcome. IVT use in the referring center was the primary modifiable factor associated with recanalization, yet its use remains low. Expanding IVT indications in primary stroke centers and developing new therapies that increase recanalization may improve outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of StrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207