MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411857674 · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-07080-z

Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire: revised in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

2025· article· en· W4411857674 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vida Yousefi Asl, Abbas Pourshahbaz, Ali Nazeri Astaneh, Farhad Taremian

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia spectrumPersianPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Clinical psychologyPsychiatryPsychometricsMEDLINEPsychosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire-Revised (BAVQ-R) is a widely used measure in research and clinical settings designed to assess beliefs about auditory hallucinations and the corresponding response styles. Despite its common usage, the psychometric properties of the BAVQ-R are understudied. This study aimed to contribute to this gap in the literature by examining the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the BAVQ-R in Iran. METHOD: A total of 298 patients diagnosed with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (aged 19–50 years; M = 37.32, SD = 1.14; 85.23% male) were recruited from Razi Hospital in Tehran. Participants completed the BAVQ-R alongside self-report measures (e.g., the Beck Depression Inventory-II [BDI-II] and the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale [SQLS]) and underwent interview-based assessments (e.g., the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales [PSYRATS] and the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia [CDSS]). RESULTS: A confirmatory factor analysis supported a 31-item four-factor model comprising two belief subscales (Malevolence/Omnipotence and Benevolence) and two response subscales (Resistance and Engagement), with excellent model fit indices (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.042). The subscales demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω = 0.91–0.95) and correlated in theoretically consistent ways with external constructs (e.g., measures of hallucinations, delusions, depression, and quality of life). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that the Persian BAVQ-R is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing beliefs about voices and response styles in Iranian patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder. These findings support its use in both research and clinical settings and suggest avenues for further research to explore its applicability across different populations and settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychiatrySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207