The relationship between grip strength, 6 minute walking distance and working memory in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: an fNIRS study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was employed to explore the potential relationship between grip strength, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and working memory in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: Participants aged 60 years and above were recruited and assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Grip strength and 6MWD were measured, and fNIRS was utilized to monitor blood flow changes in the prefrontal lobe during an N-back task. RESULTS: A total of 72 participants were recruited, aged between 70 and 95 years, with MoCA scores ranging from 10 to 25 points. The MoCA score was most strongly correlated with 1-back performance (r = -0.423, p < 0.001), followed by 0-back performance, and showed no significant correlation with 2-back performance. The activation levels of several channels in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (ch17, ch19, ch23), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (ch8), and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (ch2) were significantly higher in the high-performance group for 1-back compared to the low-performance group (p = 0.016, p = 0.008, p = 0.013; p = 0.018; p = 0.043). Grip strength and 6MWD were both significantly correlated with working memory performance under all three levels of cognitive load, with the strongest correlation observed for 1-back performance (grip strength: r = -0.377, p = 0.001; 6MWD: r = -0.382, p = 0.001). Grip strength was positively correlated with the activation levels of ch17 and ch19 (r = 0.234, p = 0.048; r = 0.249, p = 0.035), and significant inter-group differences were found for the activation level of ch19 (p = 0.032). Similarly, 6MWD was positively correlated with the activation levels of ch17 and ch2 (r = 0.312, p = 0.008; r = 0.256, p = 0.030), with significant inter-group differences observed in the activation levels of ch17, ch19, and ch2 (p = 0.007; p = 0.022; p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Cognitive decline in older adults with MCI was associated with a decline in working memory, with 1-back performance being the most sensitive measure. The brain mechanisms underlying this sensitivity involved higher activation levels in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Older adults with stronger muscle strength and better cardiopulmonary function maintained better working memory, with higher activation levels in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. However, the specific activation channels were not entirely consistent across individuals. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".