MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411870242 · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025.170779

Early results of the LEGEND-200 experiment

2025· article· en· W4411870242 on OpenAlexfundno aff
N. Burlac

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryOak Ridge National LaboratoryEuropean Research CouncilIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNarodowe Centrum NaukiBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyU.S. Department of EnergySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsLegendHistoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The search for neutrinoless double-beta ( 0 ν β β ) decay is a key area of research in modern physics, as its observation would indicate a violation of lepton number conservation, a phenomenon predicted by many extensions of the Standard Model. Among various experiments investigating this rare process, the LEGEND-200 experiment is focused on detecting 0 ν β β decay in the 76 Ge isotope using about 200 kg of germanium detectors. Fully operational at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS) in Italy, the experiment has collected a first exposure of 48.3 kg ⋅ yr, achieving a background index of ( 5 . 3 ± 2 . 2 ) ⋅ 10 − 4 cts/(keV ⋅ kg ⋅ yr). By combining data from LEGEND-200 with results from Gerda and Majorana Demonstrator , the experiment has reached a sensitivity of T 1 / 2 > 2 . 8 ⋅ 10 26 yr (90% C.L) for the 0 ν β β decay half-life in 76 Ge, with an experimental limit of T 1 / 2 > 1 . 9 ⋅ 10 26 yr (90% C.L.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→